Just a note: We know that the inclusion
yields for
. A similar inclusion statement is valid for
-spaces
iff we look at
. Here, for
, the inclusion is the other way round:
. This is not valid for
, as
is not finite.
In Cigler’s script, the fact
had just been written down quickly, and it wasn’t mentioned that this was only valid for bounded intervals. I already wondered why it was always said that the Fourier transform could be expanded to “
” and not simply “
”.