Work around the image scaling "bug"

Thursday, February 25. 2010

Work around the image scaling "bug"

Eric Brasseur explained a “bug” in the scaling algorithm of current image processing software. It’s not really a bug, technically, or mathematically. Calculating the numerical average of the surroundings of a pixel as the new color value is a pretty correct approach to scale an image down—if it’s seen as a data matrix. Rather, it’s visually not the thing you’d expect.

Technically speaking, the problem is that “the computations are performed as if the scale of brightnesses was linear while in fact it is an exponential scale.” In mathematical terms: “a gamma of 1.0 is assumed while it is 2.2.”

Here’s an example of what might occur:

The wrong way:

Take this image as a start:
Simply scale it down to 50%:

Obviously, this might not be what you intended.

The right way:

Take again this original image:
Set gamma to 0.45 (=¹⁄_2.2); In GIMP, go to Color→Levels...→Input Levels and set the middle value (1.00) to 0.45:
Scale this image down to 50%:
And finally set gamma to 2.2:

The visual appearance of the resulting image is obviously closer to that of the original.

On the command line, you could do it this way with ImageMagick:

$ convert in.png -depth 16 -gamma 0.4545 -scale 50% -gamma 2.2 -depth 8 out.png

Look at the page linked at the beginning of this post to find more details on this topic and solutions for other software.

Posted by Stephan Paukner in Information Technology, Photography at 20:45 | Comments (0) | Trackbacks (0)

Defined tags for this entry: bug, image processing, software

Trackbacks

Trackback specific URI for this entry

No Trackbacks

Comments

Display comments as (Linear | Threaded)

No comments

Add Comment

Name
Email
Homepage
In reply to
Comment	Phone* What is one plus nine? Enclosing asterisks marks text as bold (word), underscore are made via _word_. Standard emoticons like :-) and ;-) are converted to images. To prevent automated Bots from commentspamming, please enter the string you see in the image below in the appropriate input box. Your comment will only be submitted if the strings match. Please ensure that your browser supports and accepts cookies, or your comment cannot be verified correctly. Enter the string from the spam-prevention image above: BBCode format allowed
	Remember Information? Subscribe to this entry